I recently was looking through some surveys taken at a university campus that dealt with the issues of integrity. The questions were simple and straightforward. Define integrity. Name a political leader who has integrity. Name a spiritual leader with integrity. Name a company who has integrity. Name someone you know who has integrity.
What I found is that the definiton of integrity was not always sound, nor did it always make complete sense(However, there were a few that had a good grasp on a solid definition for integrity). There were many “influencers” on the answers that were given. It appeared that ones ethnicity influenced who you thought had integrity. Moral standards and even beliefs about morality influenced who you thought had integrity. Political ideologies affected who you thought had integrity. And while none of this is shocking it should cause some sense for concern because it emphasizes the effect of relativism on issues of character that should not be that subjective.
Here is what integrity is not, despite some thought on our university campuses to the contrary. Someone does not have integrity just because they agree with my lifestyle. Someone does not have integrity just because they have the same skin color as I do. Someone does not have integrity just because they are in the same political party as I am. Someone does not have integrity just because they say they do.
Integrity is really only proven over time and in secret. Integrity is seen in the crises of life, because that is where we see the stuff of which we are made. Integrity is seen more in our reactions than our actions. Clearly defined, integrity comprehends the whole moral character. It is the quality of possessing and steadfastly adhering to high moral principles. And I guess therein is where the problem lies.
In a world where moral standards are constantly assaulted, redefined and ignored, integrity has taken a beating. From “wall street to main street” as our political candidates love to say, there is an absence of integrity, or a very misconstrued definition of the word and we can see its tragic results.
We need to have the purity and genuineness that integrity calls for and there is only one way to accomplish this goal. There is only one who pure and holy. So our integrity is revealed as Jesus Christ lives out His life through us. If integrity is tied up in moral standards then we have to agree there is a wrong and right, and then we have to agree that there is a standard or measuring stick that defines wrong and right. Next we have to ask ourselves what that measuring stick or standard is for our lives.
Historically the answer is seen over and over again. It is clear that the Bible is the best standard which to uphold and that Jesus is the best example by which to live. Some of the strangeness of the survey results was not just what answers were given, but the obvious omission of answers that seem obvious. Not one person mentioned Billy Graham as a spiritual leader with integrity. Even the Pope got more nods in this category than Jesus Christ Himself, with his one vote.
If integrity continues to be defined outside of the the life of Jesus and the word of God we will continue to see economic disaster, political upheaval, and relational dysfunction like never before. But if we will return to God’s high moral standards we will find a new sense of security and peace that I believe we all would welcome.

Twitter Updates




